đź“… Date: June 22, 2025
đź“Ť Islamabad / Tehran / Washington
✍️ Reported by: Digital Newspaper
🇵🇰 Pakistan Denounces U.S. Military Action
Pakistan’s Foreign Office strongly condemned the U.S. airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, stating the move “violates all norms of international law” and warning that it could “severely damage” regional and global security. Islamabad emphasized Tehran’s right to self-defence under the UN Charter and called for an immediate cessation of violence through dialogue and diplomacy theguardian.com+15tribune.com.pk+15economictimes.indiatimes.com+15.
🌍 Other Nations Weigh In
- China warned of “catastrophic consequences,” urging restraint and cautioning that Washington might be repeating strategic errors hindustantimes.com.
- Saudi Arabia and Oman both condemned the strikes. Saudi critics called them “heinous” violations of international law, while Oman backed Pakistan’s appeal for immediate dialogue khaama.com.
- Iran, via its Foreign Ministry, labeled the attack a “brutal military aggression” and violation of the UN Charter. Tehran demanded accountability and urged the UN Security Council to act economictimes.indiatimes.com+15en.mehrnews.com+15dawn.com+15.
- India, represented by spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, said it is “closely monitoring” developments and stressed the need for de-escalation en.wikipedia.org+1indiatimes.com+1.
🔍 Analysis & Context
- Border Security Risks
Pakistan, sharing a 900‑km frontier with Iran, fears the destabilization could empower militants in its own Balochistan region ndtv.com+12reuters.com+12timesofindia.indiatimes.com+12. - Support for Diplomacy
The unified message from Islamabad and Gulf states highlights a regional demand for diplomatic resolution, warning that military escalation risks undermining regional partnerships. - Legal & Normative Alarm
The attacks have ignited renewed debate on the borders of international law regarding pre-emptive strikes on nuclear infrastructure and civilian‑adjacent targets.
đź“Ś Summary Table
| Country | Position |
|---|---|
| Pakistan | Condemns U.S. strikes; calls for peace, diplomacy; cites UN law rights. |
| China | Warns of “catastrophic consequences”; urges caution. |
| Saudi/Oman | Denounce strikes; call for immediate end to aggression. |
| Iran | Denounces the attack as “brutal aggression”; demands UN action. |
| India | Monitoring closely; urges de‑escalation. |
🧠Takeaway
Pakistan’s condemnation marks a critical shift in regional diplomatic relations—balancing its previous alignment with U.S. convenings while defending international legal norms. With regional powers urging diplomacy and Iran appealing to international bodies, the future will hinge on whether further military action is avoided—or if this serves as a flashpoint for broader escalation.